Just in front of my house lies the start of one of my favourite runs. By taking the path that lies at the southern edge of the estate where we live it is easy for the off-road runner to pick up the trails that lead down through Moses Gate and beyond. This afternoon I did just that. Picking up the old canal, now completely filled in with vegetation and the passing of time, I made my way down to Bolton Canal and out towards Radcliffe.
I really should have waited.
It’s been very warm today, and running at 4:45PM rather than, say, 8PM was a mistake that I felt within the first mile. Unusually, I was sweating so profusely that my eyes were stinging and my top felt heavy and uncomfortable. But hey…we are all made of molecules and mine were doing what they should – leaving me rapidly.
It’s not the first time that the title of Susin Nielsen’s young adult novel has been brought to the front of my mind. It’s bugged me ever since I read it a few week ago. It centres around two narrators. Stewart is ‘geeky, gifted but socially clueless’, while Ashley is ‘cool, popular but her grades stink’. They are forced together because his dad and her mum have decided to live together. Stewart still grieves the loss of his mum; Ashley is still annoyed at her dad for being gay. Within the first few pages Stewart (like many a male narrator since The Curious Incident…) is mapping out his world in diagrams and with a mathematical lexis that, well, doesn’t quite add up. Ashley is even less sympathetic and wants to become ‘unconstipated. Wait. That’s not right. I keep having to look it up. I mean emancipated.’ Her lack of precision, or even correctness with words, is not only annoying, it serves little purpose other than to reenforce the stereotype that girls can’t ever be seen as being bright, or if they are then they are definitely devoid of personality.
Like my run, I struggled to the end of the novel. It raises some serious issues and then almost serenely passes over them as the plot moves on. Whether this is because Nielsen’s perception of youngsters is that they don’t have the attention span for depth, or simply because the novel is devoid of any coherent centre to which the molecules of narrative adhere, is not really clear. What is clear is that, like my run, I was glad when it ended.